Television presenter and former gymnast Laysan Utyasheva addressed online rumors about dating other men with humor on her Instagram, noting that comments about her personal life often spiral into exaggerated narratives. She acknowledged the chatter spawned by a tabloid headline claiming she had been caught openly flirting with a man, and she treated the claim as something that deserved a closer look rather than a serious response.
Utyasheva later clarified that she had no direct knowledge of the story’s origin and that the supposed flirting had no basis in any real conversation. To keep things light, she invited her followers to share their predictions, turning the rumor into a playful moment rather than a confrontation. It soon emerged that the alleged flirtation was tied to an interview the presenter conducted with stylist Vlad Lisovets. In that interview, there was no mention of dating or romantic involvement; the misunderstanding appeared to have grown from how the exchange was interpreted by different outlets.
“If you missed the interview, I suggest you go back, read it and find out where I’m dating,” the star quipped, underscoring that readers should verify headlines against the actual content. This response highlighted her preference for clear communication over sensationalism and reflected a broader trend of fans and media seeking accurate context in celebrity coverage.
In September, Utyasheva approached the situation with restraint, choosing not to amplify any offense by engaging in a heated discussion. She emphasized that headlines can sometimes distort facts, and she encouraged a calmer, fact-based evaluation of what had occurred. This stance resonated with many followers who value responsible reporting as much as personal privacy.
Across the episode, Utyasheva demonstrated an appreciation for the craft of journalism while also defending her right to a private life. She shared several headlines that had particularly captured her attention, noting a mix of sensational language and speculative framing. Some stories portrayed the presenter as surprised or unsettled, while others suggested dramatic turns of events. The consistent thread was the reporters’ use of vivid descriptors, which she described with a light touch as editorial flair rather than a precise reflection of events.
Earlier, other public figures had faced similar scrutiny. For instance, Victoria Daineko had weighed in on the performance of fellow entertainers Buzova and Valya Carnival, offering critique in a different context of public attention and media interpretation. The exchange underscored how celebrity narratives can shift quickly, with comedians, stylists, and commentators often fueling conversations that may diverge from verified facts.