The glass pyramid at the Louvre in Paris functions as the museum’s grand entrance and has long fascinated visitors with its modern silhouette set against classic architecture. According to a report published on the social platform X by Disclose, the pyramid was recently covered with orange paint, an act that drew immediate attention from onlookers and news outlets alike. The incident was described in detail as part of a broader conversation about environmental activism and public space disruption, illustrating how protest messages can intersect with iconic cultural landmarks. (Disclose)
In a coordinated display by environmental activists aligned with the Derniere Renewal movement, several dozen participants reportedly launched paintball projectiles towards the dome of the pyramid. At least one protester is said to have climbed onto the structure and began pouring paint from a bottle, an action that visibly altered the surface and drew a strong reaction from security personnel and museum staff. The event underscores a pattern in which activists seek high-visibility stages to amplify their environmental demands, leveraging recognizable venues to spark public dialogue while risking legal consequences. (Disclose)
Those involved in the stunt asserted that the aim was to press authorities to take decisive measures to protect the environment. Their message centered on the belief that urgent policy changes are required to address ecological degradation, climate risk, and the longer-term health implications for communities. The use of a world-renowned landmark as a backdrop for their appeals reflects a strategic choice to maximize media attention and public awareness, provoking questions about where protest should occur when issues of global importance are at stake. (Disclose)
Security teams responded swiftly to the disruption, and the individuals were detained by law enforcement for questioning and potential charges related to property damage, public disturbance, or trespass. The involvement of police underscores the balance authorities attempt to strike between safeguarding cultural property and allowing peaceful demonstration. In the aftermath, museum operations continued to assess any restoration needs while illustrating a commitment to maintaining accessible public spaces for visitors, scholars, and locals who want to engage with art and history. (Disclose)
Meanwhile, in London, activists from the Just Stop Oil movement carried out a separate protest by spraying orange starch from the skeleton of a giant dinosaur exhibit at the Natural History Museum. The stunt aimed to draw attention to concerns about fossil fuels and broader energy policy. Adherents unfurled a banner calling for a pause in oil production to protect public health and the environment, framing their message in terms of urgent action needed from policymakers to curb emissions and safeguard future generations. British authorities detained those involved as part of the investigation into property damage and disruption of museum operations. (Disclose)
Across the channel, the pattern of protest in high-visibility venues continues to provoke discussions about the rights of demonstrators to convey urgent environmental messages versus the responsibilities of institutions to protect cultural and educational spaces. The actions at both the Louvre in Paris and the Natural History Museum in London reflect a broader debate on how movements leverage public art, architecture, and science to shine a light on ecological issues. They also highlight how authorities respond when demonstrations intersect with globally recognized symbols, raising questions about proportionality, safety, and the potential impact on visitors, researchers, and staff. (Disclose)
Earlier in the year, a separate event drew public attention when comedian Evgeny Petrosyan faced backlash after a joke about sclerosis during a solo performance. The incident illustrates how public discourse around health, art, and humor can intertwine with broader conversations about representation, sensitivity, and the boundaries of free expression in contemporary entertainment. Audience reactions varied, with some viewers arguing for candid dialogue about health issues, while others suggested that such topics should be handled with greater care in public performances. (Disclose)”}