Model and blogger Yulia Koroleva publicly contested claims that her ex-husband, rapper Alexey Dolmatov known as Guf, finances the couple’s home, meals, and international travel for their daughter Tina. In her account, Koroleva asserted that Dolmatov provided support for their child on only two occasions and urged the rapper not to lower himself by suggesting he covered the family’s expenses. She also stated that the artist had paid alimony just three times, challenging him to quantify expenditures on drugs and sexual services rather than the necessities of parenthood.
Koroleva described her own life as demanding and relentless, explaining that she toils to sustain the lifestyle she maintained since childhood. She said that bearing all costs herself is a heavy burden, and that it would be easier to attribute support to a romantic partner. The blogger referred to such insinuations as despicable and spoke of her commitment to independence and responsibility for her daughter’s welfare.
She added that her legal counsel is actively examining Guf’s allegations, with plans to resolve the dispute through the court system. Koroleva indicated that she had sought court orders to regulate or restrict direct communication between the rapper and their child, a move aimed at safeguarding Tina while the broader dispute proceeds through the judicial process.
On November 29, Guf released a video on social media in which he attempted to access the premises of Koroleva’s Phuket residence, accompanied by a show of brass knuckles. The clip depicted him on the property of the villa where Koroleva and Tina reside, and he claimed that he personally funded the housing arrangements for his ex-wife. The public appearance intensified scrutiny of the ongoing custody and financial dispute, drawing widespread attention from followers of both parties.
Subsequently, Koroleva alleged that the rapper threatened her child’s safety, an accusation that she said prompted her to pursue removal of parental rights through court action. The tension between the former couple has centered on control of parenting time, protection of Tina’s well being, and accountability for financial responsibilities associated with raising a minor in a high-profile family setting.
Earlier reports indicate the parties had already moved through various stages of custody discussions, with Koroleva seeking environmental and social stability for Tina and Guf contesting the nature and extent of support. The case has sparked broader conversations about the pressures faced by celebrity families dealing with custody, financial transparency, and public scrutiny. Observers note that courtroom processes may provide the framework for resolving disagreements about where Tina lives, how she spends time with each parent, and what expenses are appropriate to consider part of parental support. The outcome of the legal proceedings remains to be determined, and both sides have urged a measured approach to protect Tina’s best interests while pursuing accountability through lawful channels.