In conversations following parliamentary discussions, Deputy of the State Duma Nikolai Arefiev highlighted that implementing a progressive taxation system in Russia has gained particular relevance in the current fiscal climate. He conveyed his views in an interview with Lente.ru, arguing that a more graduated tax structure could strengthen the state budget while avoiding undue burdens on average households during periods of high public debt. The deputy stressed that a well-crafted progressive tax framework could channel additional resources to government coffers, supporting essential public services and long-term investments without indiscriminately raising taxes on everyday citizens.
Arefiev contends that there is little merit in raising housing taxes for ordinary citizens when the nation grapples with elevated debt levels. He suggested that targeted reforms, such as a progressive tax rate for higher earners and large-scale enterprises, would be a fairer approach to addressing budget gaps. The deputy noted that while the idea of progressive taxation has been debated in Parliament for an extended period, it has yet to become law. He emphasized that measures affecting oligarchs more than the general public could help balance fiscal responsibility with social equity.
Formerly Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation Ivan Solovyov commented on tax trends, projecting an increase in property taxes within Russia for 2024. Solovyov explained that a recent cadastral reevaluation of real estate had raised property values by about 20 to 25 percent on average, which in turn would influence the calculation of property tax for the coming year. The anticipated rise would reflect the revised market assessments, influencing homeowners and investors alike as calculations align with the updated property valuations.
Recent statements also touched on pension policy, with reports noting the government’s shift toward a delivery framework managed by a national postal service. This move, reported by officials, signals an effort to streamline distributions and ensure broader accessibility for beneficiaries, while discussions continue about the broader implications for social support programs and the administrative efficiency of pension administration. In this context, fiscal reform and social welfare policy intersect, prompting ongoing scrutiny of how best to balance sustainability with equity for retirees and other recipients.